THIS PROMISE IS MAKING THE ROUNDS OF SAUDI ARABIAN AND MOSLEM BROTHERHOOD CIRCLES. (
AND AMONG IRANIAN MULLAHS, THOUGH THEY ARE SHIA RATHER THAN THE SUNNI SECT OF THE BROTHERHOOD AND SAUDI ARABIA).
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Monday, July 9, 2012
GINGRICH ENCOURAGES ANTI-MULLAH MEK GROUP
Note how Gingrich bows instead of shaking hands with Maryam Rajavi, since Moslem women do not like to shake hands with men, who are not relatives.
Newt accords her the title of "president" to offset the Mullah regime.
He speaks in philosophical terms and in opposition to the USA State Department's Terrorist labeling of the Mojaheddin (MEK), the strongest anti-Mullah group around.
The Marxist-Islamist MEK, while not my favorite political group and in some ways as bad as the Mullahs are certainly worthy of political support if we want to throw a trained, dedicated (though cultish) force at the Mullahs.
The clerics have spent every moment since the start of the Khomeini Iran-Iraq war in poisoning Iranian minds against this group. Possibly the only opposition, other than the students and Green movement,they really fear. And with their base in France, unable to shell or displace as they did with those members who were in Camp Ashraf, Iraq.
Newt accords her the title of "president" to offset the Mullah regime.
He speaks in philosophical terms and in opposition to the USA State Department's Terrorist labeling of the Mojaheddin (MEK), the strongest anti-Mullah group around.
The Marxist-Islamist MEK, while not my favorite political group and in some ways as bad as the Mullahs are certainly worthy of political support if we want to throw a trained, dedicated (though cultish) force at the Mullahs.
The clerics have spent every moment since the start of the Khomeini Iran-Iraq war in poisoning Iranian minds against this group. Possibly the only opposition, other than the students and Green movement,they really fear. And with their base in France, unable to shell or displace as they did with those members who were in Camp Ashraf, Iraq.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
AMERICAN FREEDOM LOVERS NOW LABELED TERRORISTS
OBAMA REGIME REDEFINES TERRORISTS, OMITS ISLAM!
By Paul Joseph Watson
A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
Entitled Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008 (PDF), the study was produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland. The organization was launched with the aid of DHS funding to the tune of $12 million dollars.
While largely omitting Islamic terrorism - the report fails completely to mention the 1993 World Trade Center bombing – the study focuses on Americans who hold beliefs shared by the vast majority of conservatives and libertarians and puts them in the context of radical extremism.
The report takes its definitions from a 2011 study entitled Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism, produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, in which the following characteristics are used to identify terrorists.
- Americans who believe their “way of life” is under attack;
- Americans who are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”;
- People who consider themselves “anti-global” (presumably those who are wary of the loss of American sovereignty);
- Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”;
- Americans who are “reverent of individual liberty”;
- People who “believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”
The report also lists people opposed to abortion and “groups that seek to smite the purported enemies of God and other evildoers” as terrorists.
As we have exhaustively documented on numerous occasions, federal authorities and particularly the Department of Homeland Security have been involved in producing a deluge of literature which portrays liberty lovers and small government advocates as terrorists.
The most flagrant example was the infamous 2009 MIAC report, published by the Missouri Information Analysis Center and first revealed by Infowars, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists.
The rush to denounce legitimate political beliefs as thought crimes, or even mundane behaviors, by insinuating they are shared by terrorists, has accelerated in recent months.
Under the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program, the bulk purchase of food is labeled as a potential indication of terrorist activity, - as is using cash to pay for a cup of coffee, - and showing an interest in web privacy when using the Internet in a public place.
As we have documented on numerous occasions, the federal government routinely characterizes mundane behavior as extremist activity or a potential indicator of terrorist intent. - As part of its ‘See Something, Say Something’ campaign, the Department of Homeland Security educates the public that generic activities performed by millions of people every day, - including using a video camera,
talking to police officers,
wearing hoodies,
driving vans,
writing on a piece of paper,
and using a cell phone recording application,”
are all potential signs of terrorist activity.
The DHS stoked controversy last year when it released a series of videos to promote the See Something, Say Something campaign in which almost all of the terrorists portrayed in the PSAs were white Americans.
More at: http://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/
By Paul Joseph Watson
A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
Entitled Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008 (PDF), the study was produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland. The organization was launched with the aid of DHS funding to the tune of $12 million dollars.
While largely omitting Islamic terrorism - the report fails completely to mention the 1993 World Trade Center bombing – the study focuses on Americans who hold beliefs shared by the vast majority of conservatives and libertarians and puts them in the context of radical extremism.
The report takes its definitions from a 2011 study entitled Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism, produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, in which the following characteristics are used to identify terrorists.
- Americans who believe their “way of life” is under attack;
- Americans who are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”;
- People who consider themselves “anti-global” (presumably those who are wary of the loss of American sovereignty);
- Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”;
- Americans who are “reverent of individual liberty”;
- People who “believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”
The report also lists people opposed to abortion and “groups that seek to smite the purported enemies of God and other evildoers” as terrorists.
As we have exhaustively documented on numerous occasions, federal authorities and particularly the Department of Homeland Security have been involved in producing a deluge of literature which portrays liberty lovers and small government advocates as terrorists.
The most flagrant example was the infamous 2009 MIAC report, published by the Missouri Information Analysis Center and first revealed by Infowars, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists.
The rush to denounce legitimate political beliefs as thought crimes, or even mundane behaviors, by insinuating they are shared by terrorists, has accelerated in recent months.
Under the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program, the bulk purchase of food is labeled as a potential indication of terrorist activity, - as is using cash to pay for a cup of coffee, - and showing an interest in web privacy when using the Internet in a public place.
As we have documented on numerous occasions, the federal government routinely characterizes mundane behavior as extremist activity or a potential indicator of terrorist intent. - As part of its ‘See Something, Say Something’ campaign, the Department of Homeland Security educates the public that generic activities performed by millions of people every day, - including using a video camera,
talking to police officers,
wearing hoodies,
driving vans,
writing on a piece of paper,
and using a cell phone recording application,”
are all potential signs of terrorist activity.
The DHS stoked controversy last year when it released a series of videos to promote the See Something, Say Something campaign in which almost all of the terrorists portrayed in the PSAs were white Americans.
More at: http://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
