Sunday, September 26, 2010


Sign in street announcing Public Execution
The enlarged sign reads: (loose translation)

Carrying out of death sentence

Death sentence ceremony of drug smuggler
(Date - city of Ahwaz, location, 4 p.m.)

Death sentence ceremony for armed robbery and waging war against god and his prophet
(same date time and place)

Public Relations - Ministry of Justice - Khuzestan Province

ميدانيد اينها چيست؟؟





NO!  Not sand but WHEAT, purchased from Iranian farmers but without somewhere to store it - adequate silo space unavailable - dumped by trucks in the streets surrounding the silos and while this national treasure spoils BILLIONS of Dollars get paid to Canada to provide wheat to Islamic Iran.

Resulting in Persian type breads - "sangak, lavash and barbari" now cost the miserable populace about 120 times as much as before the Islamic revolt and people have to hold down three jobs to pay for their high daily BASIC expenses.


Note:  Moslem Oba-Hussein has a Sunni background while Iran is Shia and not true believers by Sunni standards - and vice-versa. Saudi Arabia has been pushing the White House to act against Iran but Oba-Hussein finds it difficult to bite either of the Islamic hands which feed him money and support. 

(Photos of Isfahan location from an Islamic Republic site)

اينها گندم های خريداری شده از کشاورزان است که بعلت عدم پيشبينی برای سيلو ويا انبار های ويژه در کنار سيلو ها در کنار خيابان انبار شده اند... اينها را کنار خيابان ريخته اند آنگاه ميليارد ها دلار پول می دهند از کانادا گندم می خرند... آنوقت نان سنگک و لواش و بربری به 120 برابر قيمت زمان پيش از شورش 57 به مردم بدبخت که برای کسب در آمد سه شغل مختلف کار می کند می فروشند. هيهات دريغا روز بيداری، دريغا صبح هوشياری... عکس ها از سايت خبرگزاری مهر (جمهوری اسلامی) برداشته شده است اينجا بخشی از اصفهان است- ح-ک

Wednesday, September 22, 2010



Washington, D.C. (March 23, 2010)– Travesty of justice does not fit the description of the events. This is simple barbarism.


International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that a Christian man, Arshed Masih, died yesterday after Muslims burned him alive for refusing to recant his faith. Additionally, a Muslim policeman raped Masih’s wife.

Masih and his wife, Martha, worked and lived at the house of Sheik Mohamd Sultan, a powerful Muslim businessman in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, since 2005.

Pakistan's most powerful man, army chef General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani is from the Rawalpindi area and is visiting the U.S. capitol.

In January, Muslim religious leaders and Sheik Sultan asked Masih and his family to convert to Islam. Masih and his family refused to convert and informed Sheik Sultan that they were going to quit working for him. The Sheik became furious and warned Masih that he would kill him if he quit. Masih told his family and friends about the entire incident. Christian leaders tried to persuade the Sheik to let Masih and his family leave his house.

On March 19, Masih was set on fire in front of the police station. At the time, three Muslim religious leaders and three policemen were present at the scene. The perpetrators have not been identified.

Masih was taken to the Holy Family Hospital where he received treatment for three days before finally dying today.

Masih’s children Mary, 12, Nasir, 10, and Neha, 7, are deeply traumatized after witnessing acts of brutality against their family at the hands of Muslims.


Found this here:

Sunday, September 12, 2010


By MIchelle Malkin

Shhhhhhh, we're told. Don't protest the Ground Zero mosque. Don't burn a Koran. It'll imperil the troops. It'll inflame tensions.

The "Muslim world" will "explode" if it does not get its way, warns sharia-peddling imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Pardon my national security-threatening impudence, but when is the "Muslim world" not ready to "explode"?

At the risk of provoking the ever-volatile Religion of Perpetual Outrage, let us count the little-noticed and forgotten ways.

Just a few months ago in Kashmir, faithful Muslims rioted over what they thought was a mosque depicted on underwear sold by street vendors. The mob shut down businesses and clashed with police over the blasphemous skivvies. But it turned out there was no need for Allah's avengers to get their holy knickers in a bunch.

The alleged mosque was actually a building resembling London's St. Paul's Cathedral. A Kashmiri law enforcement official later concluded the protests were "premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere."

Indeed, art and graphics have an uncanny way of vitiating the Muslim world's atmosphere.

In 1994, Muslims threatened German supermodel Claudia Schiffer with death after she wore a Karl Lagerfeld-designed dress printed with a saying from the Koran. In 1997, outraged Muslims forced Nike to recall 800,000 shoes because they claimed the company's "Air" logo looked like the Arabic script for "Allah."

In 1998, another conflagration spread over Unilever's ice cream logo -- which Muslims claimed looked like "Allah" if read upside-down and backward (can't recall what they said it resembled if you viewed it with 3D glasses).

Even more explosively, in 2002, an al-Qaida-linked jihadist cell plotted to blow up Bologna, Italy's Church of San Petronio because it displayed a 15th century fresco depicting Mohammed being tormented in the ninth circle of Hell. For years, Muslims had demanded that the art come down. Counterterrorism officials in Europe caught the would-be bombers on tape scouting out the church and exclaiming, "May Allah bring it all down. It will all come down."

That same year, Nigerian Muslims stabbed, bludgeoned or burned to death 200 people in protest of the Miss World beauty pageant -- which they considered an affront to Allah. Contest organizers fled out of fear of inflaming further destruction.

When Nigerian journalist Isioma Daniel joked that Mohammed would have approved of the pageant and that "in all honesty, he would probably have chosen a wife from among them," her newspaper rushed to print three retractions and apologies in a row.

It didn't stop Muslim vigilantes from torching the newspaper's offices. A fatwa was issued on Daniel's life by a Nigerian official in the sharia-ruled state of Zamfara, who declared that "the blood of Isioma Daniel can be shed.

It is abiding on all Muslims wherever they are to consider the killing of the writer as a religious duty." Daniel fled to Norway.

In 2005, British Muslims got all hot and bothered over a Burger King ice cream cone container whose swirly-texted label resembled, you guessed it, the Arabic script for "Allah." The restaurant chain yanked the product in a panic and prostrated itself before the Muslim world. But the fast-food dessert had already become a handy radical Islamic recruiting tool.

Rashad Akhtar, a young British Muslim, told Harper's Magazine how the ice cream caper had inspired him: "Even though it means nothing to some people and may mean nothing to some Muslims in this country, this is my jihad. I'm not going to rest until I find the person who is responsible. I'm going to bring this country down."

In 2007, Muslims combusted again in Sudan after an infidel elementary school teacher innocently named a classroom teddy bear "Mohammed." Protesters chanted, "Kill her, kill her by firing squad!" and "No tolerance -- execution!"

She was arrested, jailed and faced 40 lashes for blasphemy before being freed after eight days. Not wanting to cause further inflammation, the teacher rushed to apologize: "I have great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone, and I am sorry if I caused any distress."

And who could forget the global Danish cartoon riots of 2006 (instigated by imams who toured Egypt stoking hysteria with faked anti-Islam comic strips)? From Afghanistan to Egypt to Lebanon to Libya, Pakistan, Turkey and in between, hundreds died under the pretext of protecting Mohammed from Western slight, and brave journalists who stood up to the madness were threatened with beheading.

It wasn't really about the cartoons at all, of course. Little-remembered is the fact that Muslim bullies were attempting to pressure Denmark over the International Atomic Energy Agency's decision to report Iran to the UN Security Council for continuing with its nuclear research program.

The chairmanship of the council was passing to Denmark at the time. Yes, it was just another in a long line of manufactured Muslim explosions that were, to borrow a useful phrase, "premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere."

When everything from sneakers to stuffed animals to comics to frescos to beauty queens to fast-food packaging to undies serves as dry tinder for Allah's avengers, it's a grand farce to feign concern about the recruitment effect of a few burnt Korans in the hands of a two-bit attention-seeker in Florida. The eternal flame of Muslim outrage was lit a long, long time ago.

Sunday, September 5, 2010


Alan Note: cutting off heads also taught to the  drug cartels by Islamic terrorists and drug partners. None of this was happening until they arrived on scene.

By Rep. Sue Myrick

An indictment was handed down Aug. 30 by the Southern District Court of New York that shows a connection between Hezbollah - the proxy army of Iran and a designated terrorist organization - and the drug cartels that violently plague the U.S.-Mexico border.

In short, a well-known international arms dealer was trying to orchestrate an arms-for-drugs deal in which cocaine from FARC - the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, which works with Mexican drug cartels to take cocaine into America - would be traded for thousands of weapons housed by a Hezbollah operative in Mexico.

This most recent case brings up several questions:

Why would a member of Hezbollah be in Mexico?
Why would Hezbollah need thousands of weapons in Mexico?
Why are members of Hezbollah willing to work with FARC?
Perhaps to exchange weapons for drugs?
If Hezbollah has guns in Mexico and wants drugs, isn't it logical to assume that it is trading with more accessible Mexican drug cartels?

This is just the most recent incident in which it's clear that Hezbollah may have a presence in Mexico and along our southern border. There have been more incidents - which have been ignored by the Obama administration and the Department of Homeland Security.

On June 23, I sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano asking her to establish a task force to investigate the presence of Hezbollah along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The evidence is there:

 Hezbollah's cooperation with countries across South America.

Highly sophisticated tunnels for transferring drugs across the U.S.-Mexico border, ones very similar to the tunnels dug by Hezbollah into Israel.

The close relationship between Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and the increase in Iranian nationals traveling through Venezuela to receive false documents, which they use to cross into the United States.

Mexican officials raising concerns about Hezbollah operatives possibly training Mexican drug cartel enforcers in making car bombs.

Michael Braun, a former Drug Enforcement Administration chief of operations, has even been quoted as saying, "Hezbollah relies on the same criminal weapons smugglers, document traffickers and transportation experts as the drug cartels. ... They work together; they rely on the same shadow facilitators. One way or another, they are all connected."

Only a few weeks after I sent this letter, it was reported that Jameel Nasr (Arab name), a Mexican national with ties to Hezbollah in Lebanon, "entrusted with forming a base in South America and the United States to carry out operations against Israeli and Western targets," was arrested by the Mexican government.

Days later, a cell-phone-detonated car bomb - the first of its kind reported used by Mexican drug cartels - was deployed just across the U.S.-Mexico border in Juarez. On Aug. 27, another car bomb exploded in a U.S.-Mexico border state.

These car bombs show an evolution in the tactics being used by the drug cartels and bear a strong resemblance to those employed by Hezbollah, raising questions as to who trained the cartels.

Doesn't the protection of the American public deserve answers?

The primary role of the federal government is to protect its citizens.

Unfortunately, the administration continues to sit by idly while security threats go uninvestigated. And that's all I'm requesting - an investigation to find out what's going on along our southern border.

To date, I have not received a response from the Department of Homeland Security informing me of any decision to investigate. How much more is it going to take?

Friday, September 3, 2010


DETERMINED TO FORCE ISLAMIC dominance and boost the manpower of terrorists, who will rise to support him in his actions to destroy the USA, Obama uses a multiprong attack on American values and keeps open lines for drug runners, illegal aliens and Jihadis  to cross our borders.

Not content with his three lawsuit attacks on Arizona using the Eric Holder Department of Injustice, or his financing radical Islam with our taxpayer money,

he now uses the very anti-American United Nations to bludgeon an American State! An unheard of action - except by an enemy of our country.

Barack Obama just invited the United Nations to join his ongoing fight against Arizona and dozens of other states attempting to enforce the immigration laws that he refuses to enforce.

Unfortunately, you read that right. On August 20, the United States, for the first time ever, submitted a 29-page “Universal Periodic Review" (UPR) to the UN Human Rights Council, which outlines a laundry list of human rights abuses allegedly committed by the United States.

Contained within that laundry list of so-called abuses is a direct condemnation of S.B. 1070, legislation enacted by the state of Arizona (and supported by an overwhelming majority of the American people), which seeks to do the job that the federal government has refused to do... secure the border.

Specifically, the Obama Administration wrote in the report: "A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world. The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."

The submission of this UPR is the first step in a United Nations review process which will culminate with the issuance of a plan of action, approximately 90 days from now, from a panel of UN bureaucrats from France, Japan and Cameroon!!!.

At that point, the United States would be expected to "voluntarily" comply with the panel's recommendations, but as the UN Human Rights Council states on its website: “The Human Rights Council will decide on the measures it would need to take in case of persistent non-cooperation by a State..."

In short, Barack Obama has upped the ante. Not content with simply filing a frivolous federal suit against the people of Arizona, Obama has transformed his amnesty feud with the American people into an international human rights cause and effectively placed the people of Arizona (and some 20 other states that are considering similar border security bills) under the jurisdiction of a gang of America-hating United Nations bureaucrats.

Securing The Border Is No Longer Just About Amnesty... It's An Issue Of National Security.


An overwhelming majority of Americans for years have pleaded with the federal government to secure the border and stop the flood of illegal aliens pouring into the United States... but Barack Obama, believing that he knows best, has refused to take serious and substantive steps to enforce our immigration laws.

And now, right before our very eyes, cities in Arizona and across the United States literally resemble war zones as a result.

Rocket Propelled Grenade launchers.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer acknowledged this horrendous and unfortunate fact when she signed S.B. 1070 into law, "We cannot sacrifice our safety to the murderous greed of... cartels. We cannot stand idly by as drop houses, kidnappings and violence compromise our quality of life. We cannot delay while the destruction happening south of our international border creeps its way north."


Senator Jim DeMint recently echoed those sentiments: "States along the border are facing kidnappings... human trafficking and gang violence and they have a duty to keep their residents safe."

And the situation is rapidly becoming more desperate. A few days ago, the former United States Ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, spoke of this "cancerous spread of violence."

Note: Since Jihadists increasingly partnered with the Mexican Cartels, a few years ago, to make money with which to finance terrorist operations, BEHEADINGS became more and more common and with the natural cruelty of Mexican drug gangs then spread to total body dismemberment into lots of parts.

Bolton estimated that over the past four years there have been 23,000 - 28,000 violent cartel-related deaths in Mexico and said that "it's not an exaggeration to say that the stability of the government of Mexico is in doubt."

Bolton continued: "The gang warfare that you see in Mexico could easily be replicated in the United States... people who talk about controlling the border are not just talking about illegal immigration, they're worried about the importation of this kind of violence into our cities."

A SEVERED HAND AND FOOT (also seen in Islamic sharia law punishments)

Even the former champion of amnesty, Senator John McCain, is acknowledging that "Arizona is under siege..." Phoenix, Arizona is now one of the kidnapping capitals of the world, second only to Mexico City. In fact, the situation is so bad that the government has recently placed travel advisories and in some cases closed large tracts of land as far as 80 miles north (INLAND) of our southern border.

A cartel vehicle loaded with their weapons

Michael Webster with writes: "A high ranking Mexican Army commander who insists on remaining anonymous has told the U.S. Border Fire Report that Mexican coyotes are now being trained by... the Los Zetas and are operating in the deserts of Arizona."


Another story in Human Events reads: "The United States is ceding parts of Arizona... a wide corridor of Arizona from the border North to the outskirts of Phoenix is effectively controlled by the cartels."

That's why Arizona passed S.B. 1070 and that’s why as many as 22 other states are presently considering similar legislation.

And what is Barack Obama's response to this crisis? Obama has placed himself, yet again, in direct opposition to the people of the United States by inviting the United Nations to his open-borders, pro-Amnesty party.

Cartel Victim Torso

He is effectively saying to the people of the United States: The will and the safety of the American people be damned... I want amnesty to further my own twisted political agenda... therefore, I will not secure the border... I will not enforce our laws... I will frivolously sue any state that attempts to enforce the federal law... and if there is any doubt about winning in court, I'll sic the United Nations on the people of the United States.


Just last week 72 murdered victims were found close to our border but Obama refuses to take action.

Thursday, September 2, 2010


OBAMA'S U.S. Helps Radical Muslim Groups Get Taxpayer Dollars To Use Against Us.

The Obama Administration’s taxpayer-funded Islamic defense program (Why? Is there a similar one for Christians or other religions? For Jews?) has been quite busy this week, filing several discrimination lawsuits on behalf of Muslims in different parts of the country and holding Justice Department meetings to discuss prosecuting “anti-Muslim hate speech.”

The legal actions come on the same week that the White House and various federal agencies—including the Department of Homeland Security—hosted a special workshop to provide members of radical Islamic groups with direct access to U.S. government funding, assistance and resources.

Now the administration is flexing its legal muscle in its ardent quest to befriend the enemy. A federal civil rights agency known as the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed discrimination lawsuits against companies in Nebraska, California and Colorado for discriminating against Muslims by not accommodating prayer breaks and forbidding a headscarf on the job.

The government sued meatpacking plants in Greeley Colorado and Grand Island Nebraska for religious and racial harassment because dozens of Muslim employees were “denied prayer time” during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan

The lawsuit seeks changes to policies and procedures to accommodate Muslim workers, payment for past and future damages and punitive damages.

In a third lawsuit filed this week the EEOC claims that an outdoor apparel store discriminated against a Muslim female job applicant in northern California because she wore a headscarf known as a hijab. The company has a longstanding employee dress code banning any sort of head covering but the government asserts that in this particular case it’s discriminating on the basis of religion.

Also this week, the "Justice" (?) Department met with a coalition of Islamic groups that demand the administration criminally prosecute anti-Muslim rhetoric as hate speech.

Besides investing more resources to combat discrimination against Muslims, coalition leaders want Attorney General Eric Holder to “make a strong public statement” condemning hate crimes, harassment and discrimination against Muslims.

In its fervent crusade to befriend Muslims, the White House will host special workshops this week to provide members of radical Islamic groups with direct access to U.S. government funding, assistance and resources.

While this may sound surreal, it’s reality in the Obama Administration, which has embarked on a never-ending mission to befriend the enemy.

Previous efforts include SECRET meetings between Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and extremist Arab and Muslim groups to discuss national security matters and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s special order allowing the re-entry of two radical Islamic academics whose terrorist ties have for years banned them from the U.S.


As contemptible as those moves may seem, the latest effort is even more outrageous. Various government agencies, including the departments of Homeland Security, Agriculture, Education and Health will participate in the White House seminars which were exposed by an independent nonprofit dedicated to monitoring the nation’s security.

The goal is to provide the leaders of groups associated with the parent organization of Hamas and Al Qaeda (Muslim Brotherhood) with tips on cutting through “red tape” when seeking U.S. government access or money.

In all 20 national Muslim groups with ties to the global Islamist organization that preaches (VIOLENT) Jihad are scheduled to participate. Their mission is to obtain cash and other resources from Uncle Sam. (OUR MONEY NOT OBAMA'S).

While the U.S. government has kept the event quiet, it was announced in a newsletter by a Saudi-funded group (Islamic Society of North America or ISNA) that was a co-conspirator in a federal terrorist funding case a few years ago.

 Featured in a Judicial Watch special report on Muslim charities that finance terrorism, ISNA is firmly committed to spreading the radical form of Islam, which is the driving force behind Jihad.

Now the Obama Administration is helping ISNA and its radical Islamic counterparts access American taxpayer resources as well as top government officials.

Like Mayor Bloomberg offering, despite 71% of New Yorkers opposing the project, to use New York Public taxpayer money to build the Ground Zero mosque for duplicitous slumlord Imam Rauf!!!

Did America mean to establish a virtual suicide pact by electing Obama?

Time to rescind it and return to sanity. WAKE UP PEOPLE, WAKE UP WHILE YOU STILL CAN.